|
Interdisciplinary Workshop on
University of Reading, 15-18 September 2004
Minutes of Discussion Session: Future Research Directions in Boundary
Integral Equation Methods
Chair: Prof. Dr. Ivan Graham
Minutes: Dr. Tilo Arens
Prof Graham opened
the session with some brief introductory remarks and by introducing the
first speaker, Prof Wolfgang Dahmen. Prof Dahmen firstly stressed that
anything he could present on this subject was only to be understood as
his subjective opinion. In his presentation he focused on the two issues
of on the one hand choosing subjects or problems (What to do?)
and on the other hand on the question of (How to do?) this research
(see also this slide).
As a list of possible
problems he mentioned time dependent problems, stochastic problems, complex
geometries and oscillatory problems. As a common feature, all these problems
deal with multi-scale phenomena and hence require some sort of
adaptivity. In this context it is important to distinguish between
approximation with respect to a norm or the evalutation of a functional
of the solution.
On the second question,
Prof Dahmen stressed the importance of the question "What are we computing?
in the sense of balancing accuracy and efficiency of computations. This
issue requires reliable benchmarking to be answered satisfyingly. Furthermore,
successful future research in BIEM will strongly require the combination
of methods from analysis and numerics. He closed by pointing out that
he is a strong believer in complimentary research by mathematicians and
engineers.
The second speaker
was Dr Marc Bonnet who stated his views on requirements for future research
in BIEM (see also these slides). As
key issues he stated the further development of fast solution techniques
and of time domain solution techniques. It is furthermore important
to reduce redundant work in order to accelerate the attaining of goals,
for example by establishing reference techniques or by publishing implementations
of key methods for simple cases.
A major obstacle to
the development of BIE methods is the fact that the Finite Element
Method (FEM) is the dominant method for solving engineering applications.
However, in specific areas BIE methods have advantages and research should
concentrate on development for such problems.
First to contribute
to the general discussion was Prof Mazy'a, pointing out the possibility
to solve non-linear problems using an iterative boundary integral equation
approach. He also stressed that while huge achievements have been made
on numerical issues, less development has been seen in theoretical aspects.
As an example of an important problem from the view point of applications,
on which hardly anything is known theoretically, Prof Mazy'a mentioned
the representation of the flow around a ship moving in water. True progress
is only possible by a synthesis of numerics and asymptotics.
Prof Wendland answered
that the theory of boundary integral equations is often decisive for numerical
achievements as well. This fact has been proved, for example, by the development
of the Fast Multipole Method in recent years.
Prof Graham next commented
on the contribution of Dr Bonnet. He emphasized that it would be very
beneficial for the community to have a LAPACK like software package used
by everyone to speed up the development of new methods.
Some deliberately
controversial remarks were made by Prof Mikhailov in saying that boundary
integral equation techniques must move from treating linear, constant
coefficient problems to variable coefficient or nonlinear problems if
they are to have a scientific future. Prof Michielsen added that the boundary
integral equation community is still significantly smaller than the finite
element community and probably less proactive in putting out results.
Also very few commercial BEM codes are available on the market. Prof Dahmen
conceded that FE methods have the advantage of being easier to handle
while on the other hand certain problem classes are much better suited
to boundary integral equation formulations.
The discussion was
closed by some remarks by Prof Wendland who observed that he has experiences
with industry cooperations where FE methods did not work but the BEM succeeded.
He added some probable future topics to the list initially proposed by
Prof Dahmen, namely domain decomposition techniques, localized problem
formulations which can produce error estimators through BIE techniques.
|